Challenging Assumptions with Diversity and Genealogy: Same, Same but Different

Challenging assumptions in diversity and genealogy can lead to a deeper understanding of human history and the complexities of our interconnectedness. Here are some key points to consider when questioning assumptions in these fields:

1. Assumptions about Homogeneity: One common assumption is that certain groups of people or regions have remained genetically and culturally homogeneous over time. However, genetic studies have shown that human populations are far more interconnected and have experienced constant movement and mixing throughout history. Challenging assumptions of homogeneity can help us appreciate the diverse and dynamic nature of human societies.

2. Addressing Eurocentrism: Historically, much of the research in genealogy and diversity has been Eurocentric, focusing primarily on European lineages and histories. Challenging this Eurocentric bias is essential to uncovering and celebrating the contributions and stories of underrepresented populations from various regions and cultures around the world.

3. Understanding Migration Patterns: Assumptions about the origins of certain groups or cultures can be based on outdated or limited evidence. Reevaluating migration patterns can reveal unexpected connections between seemingly distinct populations and challenge notions of fixed geographical boundaries.

4. Exploring Hybrid Identities: Genealogy and diversity research have often simplified identities into singular categories, ignoring the complex intermingling of cultures and ancestries. Embracing the concept of hybrid identities can highlight the richness that arises from cultural exchange and assimilation.

5. Recognizing Prehistoric Interactions: Our understanding of prehistoric human interactions and migrations is continually evolving with advances in DNA analysis and archaeological research. Challenging assumptions about prehistoric societies can lead to more nuanced interpretations of our ancient past and how it shaped contemporary genetic and cultural diversity.

6. Unraveling Colonial Narratives: Colonial histories have often shaped how genealogical and diversity information is collected and interpreted. Challenging these narratives is crucial to recognizing the impact of colonization on diverse societies and understanding the resilience and cultural survival of indigenous and marginalized communities.

7. Questioning Linearity: Traditional genealogical research often follows a linear approach, tracing ancestry along a single line. However, considering the broader network of familial and social connections can reveal a more comprehensive and accurate representation of our shared ancestry.

8. Emphasizing Individual Agency: Assumptions about genealogy sometimes overlook the agency of individuals in shaping their own identities and relationships. Recognizing the agency of historical figures and their decisions can provide a deeper understanding of how diverse communities were formed and sustained.

9. Acknowledging Genetic Complexity: Challenging assumptions about the genetic basis of diversity means recognizing that genetic traits are influenced by numerous factors, including environment, culture, and interbreeding. Rejecting simplistic notions of genetic determinism can lead to a more nuanced understanding of human diversity.

In summary, challenging assumptions in diversity and genealogy requires a willingness to embrace complexity and nuance. By doing so, we can uncover untold stories, challenge biased perspectives, and develop a more inclusive and accurate understanding of our shared human heritage.

My First NAVY Lesson

As I talk about Diversity to people there are times when I like to share some of the stories and experiences, I have been a part of, have witnessed or retelling someone else’s story.

When I was active-duty Navy, we used to listen to stories told to us by other shipmates whether it was while at work, in the enlisted club or just lounging around the barracks. Sometimes these tales would be a bit towards science fiction but there was always a way to tell if what someone was telling you was true or not. We always knew if something started off with the phrase “This is a no shitter” that it was more than likely a true rendition and we listened a little closer.

This is a “no shitter”.

After I finished boot camp in San Diego, California and my “A” and “C” schools in Pensacola, Florida I received orders to my first duty station – Naval Security Group Activity Todendorf, German. This was a small activity in northern Germany sitting on the grounds of a German Army base. We were small, perhaps 200 – 210 people all told – including dependents.

There were not very many minorities on the command at this time. I recall only three at the time I was there. One young black male that was one of our comms persons and, one Hispanic gentleman who was our administrative type and, myself – operator/analyst. There were no enlisted women in our project at this time.

We were a 24-hour operation, so we stood rotating shifts to make sure operations were continuous. One day my supervisor, who was a senior enlisted E6 (First Class Petty Officer) came out on the watch floor at the end of our last watch and informed us that when we returned to watch in 3 days to report to a training room located in one of the other buildings. Of course, we all were curious as it was odd to pull the whole watch section off the floor for training, so we asked him what training we were all going to attend. With a disgruntled look on his face and in his voice, he told us “We are attending Watermelon U”.

Being the young, naive 19 year that I was I had no clue what he was talking about. Watermelon U? Our three-day break ended all too quick and it was time to get back to work and as ordered we all reported to the training room for our 2-day class. Watermelon U, as so politely put by my supervisor, turned out to be a diversity training class. At this time the focus was on race relations training that had been mandated by DoD only two years earlier and there was a big push to get the training out to even the smallest of stations.

It was my first experience diversity training and what an experience. Imagine a young lady trying to give her training to a class of white males, from various regions of the U.S. and most were senior enlisted. As I look back on the class now, I feel sorry for that young lady. She took it rough. You could see at times that she was almost to the point of walking out but one of the officers had gathered everyone together during a break and told them to cut out the heckling and giving her a hard time. She made it thru the second day free from the snide remarks and comments. I do remember some of the more senior enlisted trying to egg me on. The training was wrapped around the black/white issues and relationships. So, with a Hispanic last name they tired to coerce me into asking questions like “What about Mexicans” Although young and being intimidated by more senior enlisted I had the sense not to do that.

I ended up becoming great friends with a lot of the sailors there and things eventually go smoothed over. Yes, there were a couple of other race related incidents that occurred, but we will deliver those stories later.

I ended up doing twenty years in the Navy, a lot of good times and some bad but a definite learning experience when it came to diversity and inclusion. Meeting and speaking with people from around the U.S. and around the world provides one the insight of different cultures, languages, religions, and life.

Always learning, always seeing.

Identity and Belonging

I am a huge proponent suggesting that DEI professionals are also at some level of a genealogist. I was at the National Genealogist Societies national conference a few weeks ago and I had the opportunity to speak with a few of the people there just to get their thoughts on my idea. Every conversation was positive and agreed that the DEI professional that understands his or her own diversity would be better equipped to promote diversity in the workforce and community. Let me explain a little bit more on my theory.

Identity and belonging in diversity and genealogy are interconnected concepts that explore how individuals relate to their personal and cultural heritage, as well as their place within diverse societies. Let us examine each concept separately and then explore their intersection.

Identity:

Identity refers to the characteristics, qualities, beliefs, and values that define an individual or group. It encompasses various aspects, including personal traits, cultural background, social roles, and affiliations. Identity is shaped by a combination of factors, such as family upbringing, social environment, education, and individual experiences.

Belonging:

Belonging is the sense of acceptance, connection, and inclusion that individuals experience within a particular community, group, or society. It involves feeling valued, understood, and supported, and having a sense of shared purpose and collective identity. Belonging is intricately linked to social relationships, cultural norms, and a shared sense of history and heritage.

Diversity:

Diversity refers to the wide range of human differences, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, religion, and ability. Embracing diversity involves recognizing, respecting, and appreciating these differences, and promoting inclusivity and equality for all individuals. Diversity enhances society by fostering unique perspectives, creativity, and innovation.

Genealogy:

Genealogy is the study of one's ancestry and family history. It involves researching and documenting family lineage, tracing bloodlines, and understanding the historical, cultural, and geographical contexts in which ancestors lived. Genealogy helps individuals establish a connection with their roots, discover familial ties, and gain insights into their heritage.

Intersection of Identity, Belonging, Diversity, and Genealogy:

Identity and belonging are influenced by an individual's genealogy and diverse cultural backgrounds. Exploring genealogy can deepen one's understanding of their roots, heritage, and familial traditions. It provides a historical context that contributes to shaping personal identity and a sense of belonging.

Understanding one's genealogy and diverse heritage can help individuals develop a more inclusive worldview, appreciating the diversity of others and fostering empathy and respect for diverse cultures. It can also help individuals navigate the complexities of multiple identities and bridge cultural gaps in diverse societies.

Furthermore, embracing diversity and promoting inclusivity in society enhances individuals' sense of belonging and strengthens social cohesion. By recognizing and valuing diverse identities and backgrounds, individuals can create an environment where everyone feels accepted and appreciated, regardless of their genealogy or cultural heritage.

In summary, identity and belonging are influenced by genealogy and diverse cultural backgrounds. Understanding and embracing diversity in society enriches individuals' sense of belonging and helps create inclusive communities where everyone can thrive. Exploring one's genealogy can provide insights into personal identity and foster a deeper appreciation for diverse cultures and backgrounds.

#diversityinme